ISN’T GRAVITIC PROPULSION SPECIAL?
While I am skeptical of the vast majority of information shared publicly on the topic of UFOs (keep your “UAPs”... I also still call Twitter “Twitter”), it is obvious that various actors, by both Oxford definitions, have been working hard to prime the American psyche for a major development related to the topic. As I pointed out during the first round of UAP hearings aside from computer guidance systems, most of the aircraft technology known to the public is many decades old. So Occam tells me that the psyche priming is likely an orchestrated distraction from the real, highend, Made on Earth shit. When a fighter pilot testifies that he has seen something that maneuvers beyond our technology, I have no doubt that they saw what they’re claiming, but they’d be naive to think they’ve been read-in on the technology “we” have developed via black budget trillion$ in the five plus decades since their Viet Nam era F-## series fighter jets came online.
Of all the people that have risen to prominence on the ufology scene since I became interested in the topic at age 7 (shout out Leonard Nemoy’s In Search Of) I have a soft spot for Dr. Steven Greer. In part because I find his mannerisms and the language he uses more genuine than that of the military intelligence adjacent personalities like Grusch and Elizando that have garnered all the congressional and mainstream media attention. Grusch and Elizando make clear that everything they’re sharing has been okayed for release and if you parse out what they are actually saying, it is always tricky at best. And possibly designed to mislead. This does not a whistleblower make, so when they try to portray themselves as such, or make statements like, “I have to be careful because of my NDAAs, but YES.” while sharing approved secondhand info, their claims can be dismissed.
Greer too deals primarily in secondhand information, and to my knowledge hasn’t been invited to testify under oath. He claims to have encountered beings directly (the first being a bipedal deer-type guy that sounded pretty cool), but for the most part presents himself as a disclosure advocate representing military and extra-governmental program operatives for 20+ years. His claims have been generally consistent, though there is an unavoidable tinge of grift in the form of his app and E.T. excursion packages. Disclosure is not going to pay for itself, I guess. Still he does not seem nearly as dodgy as the congressional hearing bunch, and as a fellow optimist his confidence that the E.T.s are pretty chill guys is what I want to hear, so I pay attention to what he has to say.
I was listening closely when he appeared on Dana Carvey and David Spade’s podcast the week before Christmas and indicated that he was working with Green Berets that were UAP program insiders and would be coming forward before Trump takes office. This struck me as a likely false or reckless thing to say because there aren’t that many Green Berets. I DuckDuckGoed "how many Green Berets are there?" in that moment and the answer was 2,200. Fewer still active duty, and only a fraction of those protecting secret underground UAP bases. If I had to guess.
Either he was talking that shit or he’d just outed people who he claims are in grave danger for coming forward. In any event, Dr. Greer’d just established a very short timeline for his credibility. Inauguration Day, January 20, 2025.
Then came January 1, with a boom. A few booms, but I am referring to the Tesla Cybertruck boom at the Trump Hotel in Las Vegas. We learned within a few hours that susposed driver/bomber was a Green Beret! This was curious to everyone. Perhaps especially so to careful viewers of the Dana Carvey and David Spade podcast like myself. My “suicided”-detector went to 11… though I have not seen anyone else commenting on it. Greer seems to rankle proponents of Grusch and Elizando, so perhaps the noisiest parts of the ufo-community (lol) weren’t paying attention.
Oh, and the next day on Shawn Ryan’s podcast the email below, which the FBI confirms was from said exploded Green Beret (rest in peace), dropped. There are some inconsistencies in the email that had people scoffing. The made-up term “gravitic propulsion” was one of them. But I also recognized gravitic propulsion from numerous presentations by thee man, Dr. Steven Greer.
I watched the Shawn Ryan podcast where they reviewed the situation surrounding the email and it felt a little like a dramatization to me. Or worse, a military industrial distraction. The email indicated that the drones were Chinese. Better get another trillion to the contractor$ so we can catch up! Occam would note that Shawn is a “former” CIA contractor himself. Could Greer have the same handlers as these special forces pod-op-bros? As to this email being confirmation of Greer’s claims… even if everything Greer said to Carvey and Spade came straight from a sandwich board street preacher, I’d consider it more reliable than anything posited by the FBI. They needed to get New Orleans out of the news since their finger prints were all over that wouldbe bomber. Still, I remain intrigued ahead of January 20th.
Green Beret Matthew Livelsberger’s message to a special forces pod-op-bro.
Another interesting twist comes from this Green Beret that claims he was contacted by someone impersonating a Green Beret in the same unit as the bomber, possibly fishing for information on his whereabouts. The guy who posted this is who he claims to be though at a glance, a dramatist and his content also feels op-y. But if Homeland Security was hunting Green Berets after a spicy Dana Carvey and David Spade episode, that seems notable.
